Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Syria Strategy

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Merica
    Posts
    250
    Likes (Received)
    33
    Thanks (Received)
    1

    Default Syria Strategy

    Instead of/In addition to providing weapons and training for Syria, why shouldn't we also focus on getting a foothold back in Iraq to control the airspace? If I recall it was a goal in the past but we failed to come to an agreement. From what I've been reading on the news they might just be willing to allow such assets if they are available for their use as well.
    If I stay in this beloved Corps I vow to try my hardest to put a kink in the careerism and duechebaggary that plagues the ranks in an attempt to prevent the downfall of a lethal, vigorous and purportedly adaptive force.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    1,512
    Likes (Received)
    179
    Thanks (Received)
    39

    Default Re: Syria Strategy

    There should be a "moat" of radiation around the whole of the Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq from the dropping of nuclear munitions. Let them kill each other, and the survivors forge for themselves. Fuck 'em.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    1,512
    Likes (Received)
    179
    Thanks (Received)
    39

    Default Re: Syria Strategy

    This is a good read, and, I think, spot on:

    Pentagon Lays Out Options for U.S. Military Effort in Syria
    By MARK LANDLER and THOM SHANKER
    Published: July 22, 2013

    WASHINGTON — The Pentagon has provided Congress with its first detailed list of military options to stem the bloody civil war in Syria, suggesting that a campaign to tilt the balance from President Bashar al-Assad to the opposition would be a vast undertaking, costing billions of dollars, and could backfire on the United States."


    "Training, advising and assisting opposition troops could require anywhere from several hundred to several thousand troops, and cost about $500 million a year. An offensive of limited long-range strikes against Syrian military targets would require hundreds of aircraft and warships and could cost billions of dollars over time. Imposing a no-fly zone would require shooting down government warplanes and destroying airfields and hangars. It would also require hundreds of aircraft. The cost could reach $1 billion a month.

    An order to establish buffer zones to protect parts of Turkey or Jordan to provide safe havens for Syrian rebels and a base for delivering humanitarian assistance would require imposing a limited no-fly zone and deploying thousands of American ground forces."


    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/23/wo...nted=1&_r=1&hp

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pasadena, California
    Posts
    735
    Likes (Received)
    101
    Thanks (Received)
    11

    Default Re: Syria Strategy

    Quote Originally Posted by Assaultdog0351 View Post
    Instead of/In addition to providing weapons and training for Syria, why shouldn't we also focus on getting a foothold back in Iraq to control the airspace? If I recall it was a goal in the past but we failed to come to an agreement. From what I've been reading on the news they might just be willing to allow such assets if they are available for their use as well.
    We already have a foot hold in the North of Jordan right now. So we can use those bases up there for a No Fly Zone.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,993
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Thanks (Received)
    23

    Default Re: Syria Strategy

    Quote Originally Posted by Assaultdog0351 View Post
    Instead of/In addition to providing weapons and training for Syria, why shouldn't we also focus on getting a foothold back in Iraq to control the airspace? If I recall it was a goal in the past but we failed to come to an agreement. From what I've been reading on the news they might just be willing to allow such assets if they are available for their use as well.
    The agreement was that we pull out when we did. Bush got us out of Iraq, and the "peace loving" warhawk Obama tried to keep us there.
    Liberalism; such great ideas, they need to force you to follow them.

    Socialism is for the people, not the socialist.

    Economic Left/Right: 7.38
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.08
    politicalcompass.org

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •