Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 105

Thread: Caitlyn Jenner to Pose Nude With American Flag in Sports Illustrated

  1. #11
    Banned sandsjames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,984
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WILDJOKER5 View Post
    Women don't prefer Ryan Reynolds to Galifinakus? They don't objectify the mans wallet? They would like a dull, boring man over a lively funny guy? Women "Objectify" men too, its called "attraction".

    He pulls out his platinum card and offer to pay for everyone, they will flock to him and poke holes in condoms to try and trap him.

    And be honest, if Rosie Odonnell slashed her tits, are you staring?


    Nah, plenty women love seeing well dressed men.
    He's not talking about well dressed, rich men. He's talking about naked men on the cover of magazines. There's a difference in the objectification, physically, of men and women.

  2. #12
    Senior Member Rusty Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    3,936
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WILDJOKER5 View Post
    Women don't prefer Ryan Reynolds to Galifinakus? They don't objectify the mans wallet? They would like a dull, boring man over a lively funny guy? Women "Objectify" men too, its called "attraction".
    ...you're saying that objectification and attraction are the same thing? Man...

    He pulls out his platinum card and offer to pay for everyone, they will flock to him and poke holes in condoms to try and trap him.

    And be honest, if Rosie Odonnell slashed her tits, are you staring?

    Nah, plenty women love seeing well dressed men.
    LOL, women being attracted to men with money... I can't say with certainty that that's true. If that was the case, any guy in the military should be able to walk into any trailor park / ghetto, and get the hottest chick there. But that doesn't work, does it? Every one of us knows "that guy" who tries this, and gets used by that same chick who doesn't even give him any play. While, at the same time, is fucking some lowlife who lives on her block.

    Plenty of jobless shiftless men pull the hottest women. I don't know how they do it, but they do.
    "Well... Uber's going to "driverless" cars soon, and their research probably shows that they're a natural fit (when it comes to getting paid for doing nothing)."
    -Rainmaker, referencing black males

  3. #13
    Senior Member WILDJOKER5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    939
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sandsjames View Post
    He's not talking about well dressed, rich men. He's talking about naked men on the cover of magazines. There's a difference in the objectification, physically, of men and women.
    Nope, I think women are just better at hiding it in public. Women lust just as much as men do.
    Progressivism; such great ideas, they need to force you to follow them.

    Socialism is for the people, not the socialist.

    Economic Left/Right: 7.38
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.08
    politicalcompass.org

  4. #14
    Senior Member Rusty Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    3,936
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WILDJOKER5 View Post
    Nope, I think women are just better at hiding it in public. Women lust just as much as men do.
    Keep believing that lie.
    "Well... Uber's going to "driverless" cars soon, and their research probably shows that they're a natural fit (when it comes to getting paid for doing nothing)."
    -Rainmaker, referencing black males

  5. #15
    Senior Member WILDJOKER5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    939
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rusty Jones View Post
    ...you're saying that objectification and attraction are the same thing? Man...
    Yes I am. Men look at women physical appearances biologically just as women look at many traits of men because of biology. Men have a much larger roll in the human society than women do due to biology. Women were there just to procreate and protect the next generation while the man is supposed to be the hunter (physical), provider (financial) and putting the family at ease (personality). This was how its been up till 60 or so years ago when a few women convinced themselves they needed to be part of the mans world.

    LOL, women being attracted to men with money... I can't say with certainty that that's true. If that was the case, any guy in the military should be able to walk into any trailer park / ghetto, and get the hottest chick there. But that doesn't work, does it? Every one of us knows "that guy" who tries this, and gets used by that same chick who doesn't even give him any play. While, at the same time, is fucking some lowlife who lives on her block.
    Well, I wouldn't lump a military man with someone who makes 6 figures a year. Nor would I put trailer park girls in the same category as "normal intelligence" women either. But you still hit on a big conundrum of which part of the trifecta of manly traits wins out, "hunter" (low-life), or provider (military). Put a guy with serious amounts of cash, say Rainmaker, and lets see if the druggie low-life wins out.

    Plenty of jobless shiftless men pull the hottest women. I don't know how they do it, but they do.
    Sorry to hear about your bad luck with women, but there is a reason military men go to Korea and the jucies are asking them to "take me to the big BX in the sky" no matter how fuggly the guy is.
    Progressivism; such great ideas, they need to force you to follow them.

    Socialism is for the people, not the socialist.

    Economic Left/Right: 7.38
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.08
    politicalcompass.org

  6. #16
    Banned sandsjames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,984
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WILDJOKER5 View Post
    Nope, I think women are just better at hiding it in public. Women lust just as much as men do.
    You pointed out in your previous post that what women lust for is the illusion of power and money, not physical.

  7. #17
    Senior Member WILDJOKER5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    939
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rusty Jones View Post
    Keep believing that lie.
    I get it, you think women are in no way like men.
    Progressivism; such great ideas, they need to force you to follow them.

    Socialism is for the people, not the socialist.

    Economic Left/Right: 7.38
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.08
    politicalcompass.org

  8. #18
    Senior Member WILDJOKER5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    939
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sandsjames View Post
    You pointed out in your previous post that what women lust for is the illusion of power and money, not physical.
    They don't lust for Ryan Reynolds or Channing Tatum over Gary Busey or Clint Howard?
    Progressivism; such great ideas, they need to force you to follow them.

    Socialism is for the people, not the socialist.

    Economic Left/Right: 7.38
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.08
    politicalcompass.org

  9. #19
    Senior Member Rusty Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    3,936
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WILDJOKER5 View Post
    Yes I am. Men look at women physical appearances biologically just as women look at many traits of men because of biology. Men have a much larger roll in the human society than women do due to biology. Women were there just to procreate and protect the next generation while the man is supposed to be the hunter (physical), provider (financial) and putting the family at ease (personality). This was how its been up till 60 or so years ago when a few women convinced themselves they needed to be part of the mans world.
    Great, but I wasn't talking about that. I was talking about putting a naked guy in the cover of a magazine not having the same effect as putting a woman there, in response to sparks.

    Well, I wouldn't lump a military man with someone who makes 6 figures a year. Nor would I put trailer park girls in the same category as "normal intelligence" women either. But you still hit on a big conundrum of which part of the trifecta of manly traits wins out, "hunter" (low-life), or provider (military). Put a guy with serious amounts of cash, say Rainmaker, and lets see if the druggie low-life wins out.
    A guy living in the dorms who has almost a thousand dollars every two weeks without a single bill to pay is probably the best thing that a trailor park / ghetto chick is ever going to see; in terms of men with money. If women really cared about money, it would be impossible for a man without it to get laid.

    Sorry to hear about your bad luck with women, but there is a reason military men go to Korea and the jucies are asking them to "take me to the big BX in the sky" no matter how fuggly the guy is.
    I'm a married man of ten years. Aren't you recently divorced?

    The most sexually frustrated men I know are the "metrosexual" types that try to get women based on their looks and clothes; and then are pissed when a man who is their exact opposite are getting the women they wanted.

    Remember Elliot Rodger?

    Never once have I ever tried to use money or dress a certain way to attract women. Why? Because it doesn't work. For men, it's all about "game." Nothing else. GAME.
    "Well... Uber's going to "driverless" cars soon, and their research probably shows that they're a natural fit (when it comes to getting paid for doing nothing)."
    -Rainmaker, referencing black males

  10. #20
    Senior Member Rusty Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    3,936
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by WILDJOKER5 View Post
    I get it, you think women are in no way like men.
    Yes, I do. And men who think they're going to get women the same way women get men are going to fail 100% of the time.
    "Well... Uber's going to "driverless" cars soon, and their research probably shows that they're a natural fit (when it comes to getting paid for doing nothing)."
    -Rainmaker, referencing black males

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •