Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: AF introduces enlisted Global Hawk pilots

  1. #1
    Senior Member Bos Mutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,565
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)

    AF introduces enlisted Global Hawk pilots

    WASHINGTON (AFNS) --
    Air Force officials announced a new initiative Dec. 17 to enhance the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance mission by integrating enlisted remotely piloted aircraft pilots into the force.

    Air Force officials stated a dynamic threat environment calls for innovative approaches to high-demand missions. After careful
    consideration and with an eye toward potential future force needs, service officials plan to deliberately integrate the enlisted force into flying operations, starting with the RQ-4 Global Hawk.

    “Our enlisted force is the best in the world and I am completely confident they will be able to do the job and do it well,” said
    Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James. “The RPA enterprise is doing incredibly important work and this is the right decision to ensure the Air Force is positioned to support the future threat environment. Emerging requirements and combatant commander demands will only increase; therefore, we will position the service to provide warfighters and our nation the capability they deserve today and in the future.”

    The secretary and chief directed Air Combat Command to develop an implementation plan over the next six months to address items like entry requirements, training plans, career path development, delineation of duties, compensation details and an appropriate force mix. Implementation is focused on the Global Hawk community, not the MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper force.

    http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDispla...wk-pilots.aspx
    So, this is kinda huge for the AF...
    Last edited by Bos Mutus; 12-17-2015 at 07:01 PM.
    The Voice of Reason

  2. #2
    Senior Member Absinthe Anecdote's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    3,669
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos Mutus View Post
    So, this is kinda huge for the AF...
    It is damned huge and I bet there was a big fight about it. Although the officer corps hated UAVs, they were against giving up any pilot seat to the enlisted force.

    The things fly themselves anyway, and it is a stretch to call it a pilot seat.

    I guess enough of the old guard retired to allow it, or the officer pilots bitched enough about being assigned to them.

    Global Hawk missions are long and pretty damned boring most of the time, even if you are working with data from the sensors.

    The pilots have little to nothing to do with the data that is being collected, so it has to be extremely boring.

    When I left the Air Force the Global Hawk had a lot of problems and wasn't ready to take over the U-2 mission.

    I'm guessing they have worked the bugs out and platforms like Global Hawk will eventually take over RJ-135 missions too.
    All behold that fancy strutting peacock, the bake sale diva...

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    the moon
    Posts
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos Mutus View Post
    So, this is kinda huge for the AF...
    Kinda huge but still a disservice. These slots should be warrant officers.

  4. #4
    Senior Member TJMAC77SP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    3,156
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Airborne View Post
    Kinda huge but still a disservice. These slots should be warrant officers.

    Then there wouldn't be anyone flying Global Hawks.
    ___________________
    Read carefully, think, then write thoughtfully……………………………..

    I don’t have any quotes……you can pick one for yourself

  5. #5
    Administrator UncaRastus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    MTF-HQ
    Posts
    1,196
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    3
    The USMC have an MOS for that, amongst the enlisted. 7314 UAV Controller. That's been around for awhile.
    Theirs not to question why, theirs but to do and die, into the valley of spam, rode the Super Moderators

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    965
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Airborne View Post
    Kinda huge but still a disservice. These slots should be warrant officers.
    The USAF has not had warrants for a VERY long time.

    If an NCO can command an M-1 Tank and crew in combat, a semi-autonomous drone, with no lives at stake is a relatively trivial responsibility.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Shrike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Local Group
    Posts
    653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Wow. For many, many years the USAF has operated under one very big, very obvious lie that everyone's just kind of silently agreed to: that it takes an officer to fly a plane. This, in spite of the service's very own storied history of enlisted flyers.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Absinthe Anecdote's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    3,669
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Shrike View Post
    Wow. For many, many years the USAF has operated under one very big, very obvious lie that everyone's just kind of silently agreed to: that it takes an officer to fly a plane. This, in spite of the service's very own storied history of enlisted flyers.
    I once asked CMSAF Murray if he thought it was feasible to provide the enlisted force a path to the pilot's seat like the Army's warrant officer program for helicopter pilots.

    He dodged the question as I expected he would.

    I'm not that surprised this happened with the Global Hawk. You can make a very strong case that it doesn't require a pilot.

    With Global Hawks the computer flies it nearly all the time. I'm not sure if it is like the Predators were a separate crew at the launch and recovery base handles take offs and landings.

    You could make a case that the crew that launches and lands them are pilots.

    Once it is at altitude another crew takes over.

    During the mission that other crew that might be on the opposite side of the globe from where the aircraft is flying.

    Plus, the Global Hawk's mission profile puts it way above the weather, like the U-2. That aircraft is on autopilot most of the time too. The "pilots" are just entering waypoints for it to fly to.
    All behold that fancy strutting peacock, the bake sale diva...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •