Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Another day... Another mass shooting...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    759
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Another day... Another mass shooting...

    Business as usual...

    Obviously we need more guns to stop these incidents...


    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/reports-...tte-louisiana/
    Antes de que vengas a juzgarme por que escribo el inglés con errores te pregunto: Cuantos idiomas tu hablas?! Solo uno? Y vienes a juzgar mi inteligencia?! Por favor mirate en el espejo y veras en él reflejo la imagen clara de la estupidez...

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, ohio
    Posts
    3,326
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bunch View Post
    Business as usual...

    Obviously we need more guns to stop these incidents...


    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/reports-...tte-louisiana/
    OR better enforcement of the gun laws we already have.

    BUT until more info comes out i cannot comment much more.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    851
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bunch View Post
    Business as usual...

    Obviously we need more guns to stop these incidents...


    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/reports-...tte-louisiana/
    Fact: if someone is approaching you to kill you with a gun, you have a much better chance of living if you had a gun too. Liberals don't understand this. They believe that MORE laws are the answer to making you safe. However, we all know who obeys laws and who does not.

    I really wish the national media outlets mentioned every time a gun was used to prevent a murder. In the last two years in Vegas alone, I know of four instances where the armed homeowner stopped a home invasion from succeeding. However, only the local media mentioned it. The national media wouldn't have the airtime to inform the public everytime a gun SAVED a life. It just happens too many times.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Columbus, ohio
    Posts
    3,326
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    And once again the media is saying the shooter was Mental. What is it with nearly ever shooter we have had in the past 2-3 years, having "mental problems'??

  5. #5
    Senior Member Bos Mutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,554
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FLAPS, USAF (ret) View Post
    Fact: if someone is approaching you to kill you with a gun, you have a much better chance of living if you had a gun too. Liberals don't understand this. They believe that MORE laws are the answer to making you safe. However, we all know who obeys laws and who does not.

    I really wish the national media outlets mentioned every time a gun was used to prevent a murder. In the last two years in Vegas alone, I know of four instances where the armed homeowner stopped a home invasion from succeeding. However, only the local media mentioned it. The national media wouldn't have the airtime to inform the public everytime a gun SAVED a life. It just happens too many times.
    I'm a gun owner, but not really a huge gun guy...I'm okay with most people having guns and think it's a pretty good idea to have one at home...even carry.

    Both sides can quote "examples" of it being too easy to have a gun....or having a gun saved a life...or having a gun cost a life...etc. You can read some "studies" that a privately owned gun is 40 times more likely to be used on the family that owns it rather than to protect them....or that gun owners are 9 times more likely to be injured by gun accidents than non-gun owners are to be attacked by guns...OTOH, you can read statistics of all the "non-firing" prevention that guns did...i.e. possession of a gun prevented someone else from firing...how do you count these statistics?

    Bottom line...is almost all the studies on use of guns and gun safety are privately funded...by people from one side or the other...and are performed with a conclusion they already want to prove in mind.

    You know 4 times a gun in Las Vegas was used to prevent a murder? How many times were they used to murder someone? How many accidental gun fatalies occurred in Vegas in the last 2 years? My guess is a lot more than 4.

    My issue isn't anti-gun...my issue is that we don't have any honest studies on any of this.

    Why aren't there independent honest studies on gun safety vs. rightful use?... Well, one big reason is that there is a law that says Federal Govt. money may not be used to study gun safety. Say what? Yeah, that's right...we can not have a govt. study on gun safety.

    Now that sounds silly...of course, it's because the Gun Lobby is too afraid that the Anti-Gun people would use such a study to take away their guns.

    I think we'd all be better of if we all accepted a few realities here:

    1) We will NEVER rid the U.S. of normal people being able to buy and own guns legally. Of course, this is what the anti-gun groups ultimately want...all private gun ownership banned. Once they realize this is never going to happen, the better off we'll be.

    2) Guns can be made safer. They can have more clear indicators of round-in-chamber, for example. The pro-gun groups seem to think every attempt to make guns safer is an step on the road to taking them all away....now that doesn't stop the intentional use of guns to commit crimes, but it'd help the accidental injury part maybe.

    3) Gun Free zones don't work and are stupid. They will only work if the entire country is a gun free zone and, well, see #1.
    Last edited by Bos Mutus; 07-24-2015 at 06:35 PM.
    The Voice of Reason

  6. #6
    Senior Member Bos Mutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,554
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by garhkal View Post
    And once again the media is saying the shooter was Mental. What is it with nearly ever shooter we have had in the past 2-3 years, having "mental problems'??
    Sane people generally don't shoot up theaters.

    The media coverage and discussion we all have on these incidents very much feeds into the mentally ill's desire to "show them all"...and get some attention, whatever.

    Why would a sane person shoot up a theater?
    The Voice of Reason

  7. #7
    Senior Member Rainmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    on a Marl Road
    Posts
    3,882
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos Mutus View Post
    Sane people generally don't shoot up theaters.

    The media coverage and discussion we all have on these incidents very much feeds into the mentally ill's desire to "show them all"...and get some attention, whatever.

    Why would a sane person shoot up a theater?
    Now, this is what I'm talking about...Accuracy Brevity Clarity! A++ good Bos!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    759
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos Mutus View Post

    Why would a sane person shoot up a theater?
    Thats my main objection to the "responsible gun owner" argument. Thing is that people are so called "responsible gun owners" until they decide to kill their spouse, their children, their neighbor ... Then at that point they cease to be "responsible gun owner" guy/gals and become "mental" cases.
    Antes de que vengas a juzgarme por que escribo el inglés con errores te pregunto: Cuantos idiomas tu hablas?! Solo uno? Y vienes a juzgar mi inteligencia?! Por favor mirate en el espejo y veras en él reflejo la imagen clara de la estupidez...

  9. #9
    Senior Member Bos Mutus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,554
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bunch View Post
    Thats my main objection to the "responsible gun owner" argument. Thing is that people are so called "responsible gun owners" until they decide to kill their spouse, their children, their neighbor ... Then at that point they cease to be "responsible gun owner" guy/gals and become "mental" cases.
    This is a far more difficult issue than people give it credit for.

    On a few of these cases, the shooters even had a record of getting mental health treatment. Okay, so people say, " gee, let's just have a mental health register and prevent those people from buying guns like we do felons or whatever."

    There are huge repercussions to that simplistic idea.

    How many gun owners might avoid getting needed mental health treatment of any kind for fear that they will lose their guns?
    We already talk about the stigma of getting mental health treatment in the military because it affects sensitive position, clearances, etc...how many more veterans might avoid getting help if they would lose their guns by doing so? I think it could be significant...

    OTOH, how irresponsibile is it to maintain someone's security clearance when you know they have serious mental health issues?

    Tough call.

    You're right...we don't know who these guys are until they do it...and trying to identify them ahead of time means identifying thousands who would never in the same basket.
    Last edited by Bos Mutus; 07-24-2015 at 07:06 PM.
    The Voice of Reason

  10. #10
    Administrator UncaRastus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    MTF-HQ
    Posts
    1,196
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    3
    Bunch,

    'sup, my friend?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •