Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: CPO 365

  1. #1
    Senior Member Stalwart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Annapolis, MD
    Posts
    1,055
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)

    CPO 365

    Quote Originally Posted by 4CECMC View Post
    Nothing wrong with being pay grade terminal, especially as it applies to this specific thread. It was those who were comfortable with being terminal by choice, that made if very simple to "float up" those in a peer group that aspired for increased roles and responsibility. I never pushed boots, pursued off duty education, recruited, etc... but did quite well for myself and more importantly, my Sailors. Very easy to separate those who were doing extra curricular "stuff" simply for an eval bullet, verses those who were having a true impact on the Sailors and the mission. Actually spawns another discussion about CPO 365 and required all E-6's to participate - even those that wanted to retired as an E-6. But being just a "recruit" in this forum, I cannot start a new thread and can only chime in on those that are already started.

    CPO 365

  2. #2
    Senior Member BURAWSKI's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    305
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)

    Re: CPO 365

    Quote Originally Posted by Stalwart View Post
    CPO 365
    The whole idea of CPO 365 is born out of the idea that their was something wrong with the way things were done before. Have these changes made things better? I think not.

  3. #3
    Administrator UncaRastus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    MTF-HQ
    Posts
    1,196
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    3

    Re: CPO 365

    Luckily, on leap year extension day, first class petty officers can kick back.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: CPO 365

    Burawski - I don't believe CPO 365 has produced a better Chief or enhanced the process at all. I firmly believe that within the next couple of years, MCPON13/14 will bend to the pressure of the WR and eliminate "final night" in its entirety, and closely mirror what the other Services are doing. Not that the USA/USAF/USMC have gotten it totally wrong -- but as you know, there is a huge difference between a Navy Chief and a Army SFC. Being the Son of retired Soldier and a Son of my own who just pinned on E-8, (who fully understands the necessary and very much required steps in the transformation process), lots to be learned from our time honored tradition and the track record of our CPO forefathers. Tried, Tested, Initiated - Navy Chief/Navy Pride!!! And no, never submitted an CWO/LDO package!

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: CPO 365

    Nice thread Stalwart - thanks Shipmate!

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: CPO 365

    Quote Originally Posted by BURAWSKI View Post
    The whole idea of CPO 365 is born out of the idea that their was something wrong with the way things were done before. Have these changes made things better? I think not.

    It does seem to be a solution that no one was asking for in search of a problem I don't remember anyone having.

    Long term I do sorta agree with 4ECMC about one thing. The Blue Shirt / Chief division, as in having pretty much two completely separate communities of enlisted people, is probably not long for this world as we have it now. More and more commands, billets, duties, missions, and so forth are going to become Joint Service oriented and the other branches just don't have this concept.

    When I was with the Army in Afghanistan I just could not explain "Chiefs" to the Army guys. I mean sure they have a concept of a senior enlisted, but the idea of there just being some magical point where the upper enlisted ranks becomes some separate organized community... no they didn't get it.
    Never has a more accurate view of the world been advanced in human history then by that person whom decided to name a group of Navy Chiefs a Mess.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Rusty Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Norfolk, VA
    Posts
    3,936
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)

    Re: CPO 365

    The "separate community" thing is really what separates the two, and it's self-imposed by the Navy. Ironically, the duties and responsibilities of a Navy CPO and an Army SFC are pretty much the same - a division LCPO and a platoon sergeant are typically both in the paygrade of E7, and that's the first paygrade in both services that's billeted to report directly to an officer (DIVO in the Navy, platoon leader in the Army; both normally O1 or O2).
    "Well... Uber's going to "driverless" cars soon, and their research probably shows that they're a natural fit (when it comes to getting paid for doing nothing)."
    -Rainmaker, referencing black males

  8. #8
    Senior Member Stalwart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Annapolis, MD
    Posts
    1,055
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)

    Re: CPO 365

    Full disclosure: I am not a prior Chief, I am a prior USMC SNCO (GySgt).

    That said, I don't know if CPO 365 is really the entire problem (again, it is a solution that few asked for but ...)

    More I see a problem with many (not all) new Chiefs that I encounter today is a lack of effective leadership training / development prior to being selected for Chief. IMO (and I am probably inviting a lot of criticism of my opinion), Marine NCO's tend to be better leaders than petty officers, it is taught to them much earlier and while it is comparing apples to oranges, from a leadership perspective a Cpl (USMC) tends to be a better leader than a 3rd Class, a Sgt tends to be a better leader than a 2d Class. Once you get to SSgt (USMC) you kind of encounter this weird difference with the Navy in that a SSgt is not supposed to be the same thing as a 1st Class, a SSgt is really more like a Chief in many ways (1st boarded promotion in the USMC, is the senior unit leader for a platoon (Platoon Sergeant -- kind of like a LCPO) and at that point is a SNCO (some uniform changes etc.)) I will say that I think as a result of the differences in the way the USMC develops an enlisted leader (more gradually) the average SSgt hits the ground running faster than the average Chief. Every time I have had a Division or a Department, I have encouraged pushing more to the 2d Classes and 3rd Classes since this is how I think (old habit) I have my opinion that it works and in general it didn’t change the world (did have a couple success stories.)

    I have a heck of a lot of respect for Chiefs (especially after observing a selection board) and the work they do and the role they have. When I start comparing Chiefs and SNCO's I don't see one as better than the other, each fulfills the same role in two different services with two different missions. I have known INCREDIBLE Chiefs, I have known average Chiefs, and I have known a couple that just didn't perform, the same with SNCO's. I had a rough start after commissioning with a few Chiefs (2 of my first 3 left the Navy without retirement -- one as a 1st Class) and as a result of that rocky start I distrusted Chiefs for a long time (my mistake – a few bad apples spoiled the bunch.) I learned how to shed the GySgt mentality and start becoming an officer as a result of a few really good Chief's I owe a lot of credit for the officer I turned into (not the best, but not the worst.) One of the most humbling moments to date was on my DDG was when the Chiefs invited me to lunch in the mess when I was checking out and gave me a plaque and one of their mugs.

    For me, the absolute best thing a command can have is a good Goat Locker (benefits the crew, benefits the Wardroom) and the absolute worst thing a command can have is a bad Goat Locker.

  9. #9
    Senior Member BURAWSKI's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    305
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)

    Re: CPO 365

    Unfortunately, a good Goat Locker is a thing of the past. The CPO Community does not function due to the removal of the fraternal aspect and making it just another pay grade, as well as removal of the initiation and replacing it with a formalized training program. Also, from what I've seen and experienced, the other problem is that the CMC's, Force/Fleet MCPO's and MCPON do not identify with the CPO Community. These positions actually operate outside, and independently of the CPO Community (a big reason for CPO 365). These positions have morphed into a community of their own. Why else would you see a CMC require a fellow CPO to make an appointment with their administrative assistant to be able to meet with them? (It was like that at the Naval Academy with a former CMC who used to work there). It's been that way for many years.


    B. M. BURAWSKI
    Chief Yeoman, USN (Ret.)

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    The Coast
    Posts
    273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Re: CPO 365

    Quote Originally Posted by BURAWSKI View Post
    Unfortunately, a good Goat Locker is a thing of the past. The CPO Community does not function due to the removal of the fraternal aspect and making it just another pay grade, as well as removal of the initiation and replacing it with a formalized training program. Also, from what I've seen and experienced, the other problem is that the CMC's, Force/Fleet MCPO's and MCPON do not identify with the CPO Community. These positions actually operate outside, and independently of the CPO Community (a big reason for CPO 365). It's been that way for many years.


    B. M. BURAWSKI
    Chief Yeoman, USN (Ret.)

    Well said!!

    The star chambers fear of ending up in message traffic and the Navy turning into a corporation does not help.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •